blue painting

Tokenization in the Fund Industry: why it is the future but not yet the present, and a possible solution

If you enjoy reading our articles and want to support our mission of sharing valuable insights on AML and investment funds, the easiest way to help is by subscribing to the Fundiligence newsletter.
For us it is very important, for you it is FREE.

Tokenization of shares has the potential to bring significant innovation to Luxembourg’s financial services sector and surely worldwide, offering opportunities to improve processes and operational efficiency in the Investment fund Sector. But today, is tokenization truly beneficial for an investment funds in Luxembourg? The answer is most probably NO – at least not within the current regulatory framework. Despite the theoretical benefits of tokenization – such as democratizing access, enhancing liquidity, and improving processes – these advantages are largely diminished in practice for the Luxembourg fund industry due to regulatory restrictions and structural limitations, and as the present moment it offers more challenges than opportunities. In this article, we will explore the potential and limitations of tokenization within Luxembourg’s current regulatory framework by examining three distinct use cases: Reserved Alternative Investment Funds, UCITS funds, and real estate assets and we will propose a potential solution, which is gradually taking place.

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.